Filed: Aug. 05, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6544 DEVONE BATES, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JIMMIE GOOSBY; ROBERT KIRVEN, Plaintiffs, versus L. H. BREEZE; EUNICE BELVIN; UNKNOWN OR IDEN- TIFIED MEDICAL EMPLOYEES OF HENRICO COUNTY JAIL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-95-254-3) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996 Before WIDENER, NI
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6544 DEVONE BATES, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JIMMIE GOOSBY; ROBERT KIRVEN, Plaintiffs, versus L. H. BREEZE; EUNICE BELVIN; UNKNOWN OR IDEN- TIFIED MEDICAL EMPLOYEES OF HENRICO COUNTY JAIL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-95-254-3) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIE..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6544
DEVONE BATES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JIMMIE GOOSBY; ROBERT KIRVEN,
Plaintiffs,
versus
L. H. BREEZE; EUNICE BELVIN; UNKNOWN OR IDEN-
TIFIED MEDICAL EMPLOYEES OF HENRICO COUNTY
JAIL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-95-254-3)
Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Devone Bates, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint without prejudice for failure
to provide the court with addresses of Defendants. The complaint
may be saved by amendment. Thus, we have no jurisdiction over the
appeal. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,
10
F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993). We deny leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3