Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Blackwell, 96-6565 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6565 Visitors: 49
Filed: Dec. 17, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6565 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CORNELL BLACKWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-62-P, CA-96-68-3-P) Submitted: November 26, 1996 Decided: December 17, 1996 Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cor
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6565 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CORNELL BLACKWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-62-P, CA-96-68-3-P) Submitted: November 26, 1996 Decided: December 17, 1996 Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cornell Blackwell, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo- tion filed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Blackwell, Nos. CR-92-62-P; CA-96-68-3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer