UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6581 WALTER JAMES WINFIELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANDRE A. HILL, Defendant - Appellee, and D. R. LAWSON; P. A. TERRANGI, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-145-3) Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 10, 1996 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter James Winfield, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no rever- sible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magis- trate judge. Winfield v. Hill, No. CA-95-145-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to disposition by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994). 3