Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Brent, 96-6679 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-6679 Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6679 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY L. BRENT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-83-NN, CA-95-141-4) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished pe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6679 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY L. BRENT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-83-NN, CA-95-141-4) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney L. Brent, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Hardwick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motions for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to vacate sentence and to voluntarily dismiss his motion to vacate sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brent, Nos. CR-93-83-NN; CA-95-141-4 (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer