Filed: Aug. 14, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6688 BENJAMIN SHABAZZ PEAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NURSE GUITON; DOCTOR LINDSEY; STEPHEN KAFTAN, Defendants - Appellees, and GEORGE L. MCBANE, U. S. Marshal, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-520-2) Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: August 14, 1996 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, a
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6688 BENJAMIN SHABAZZ PEAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NURSE GUITON; DOCTOR LINDSEY; STEPHEN KAFTAN, Defendants - Appellees, and GEORGE L. MCBANE, U. S. Marshal, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-520-2) Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: August 14, 1996 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, an..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6688
BENJAMIN SHABAZZ PEAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NURSE GUITON; DOCTOR LINDSEY; STEPHEN KAFTAN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
GEORGE L. MCBANE, U. S. Marshal,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-94-520-2)
Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: August 14, 1996
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Shabazz Peay, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Moore Lewis, COUNTY
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's orders and opinion accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Peay v. Guiton, No. CA-94-520-2 (M.D.N.C. July 6, 1995; Mar.
29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3