Filed: Dec. 03, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6702 BRUCE ALLEN GAYNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE ALLEN; DONALD BEYERS; JERRY W. KILGORE; JAMES S. GILMORE, III; RONALD J. ANGELONE; EDWARD C. MORRIS; JOHN M. JABE, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-96-223-AM) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996 Before HALL, W
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6702 BRUCE ALLEN GAYNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE ALLEN; DONALD BEYERS; JERRY W. KILGORE; JAMES S. GILMORE, III; RONALD J. ANGELONE; EDWARD C. MORRIS; JOHN M. JABE, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-96-223-AM) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996 Before HALL, WI..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6702
BRUCE ALLEN GAYNOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE ALLEN; DONALD BEYERS; JERRY W. KILGORE;
JAMES S. GILMORE, III; RONALD J. ANGELONE;
EDWARD C. MORRIS; JOHN M. JABE, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District
Judge. (CA-96-223-AM)
Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Allen Gaynor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
motion for a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunc-
tion enjoining the enforcement of an amendment to the prison regu-
lation governing personal property. To the extent that Appellant
appeals from the court's denial of a temporary restraining order,
that order is not appealable. See Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc.,
538
F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976). We have reviewed the record and
the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion and no
reversible error. See Direx Israel, Ltd. v. Breakthrough Medical
Corp.,
952 F.2d 802, 812-13 (4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm
the denial of preliminary injunctive relief on the reasoning of the
district court. Gaynor v. Allen, No. CA-96-223-AM (E.D. Va. Feb.
22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2