Filed: Aug. 06, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6706 DONALD HUBERT WAGNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; OFFICER HICKS; OFFICER LUDWIG, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-657-3) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6706 DONALD HUBERT WAGNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; OFFICER HICKS; OFFICER LUDWIG, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-657-3) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6706
DONALD HUBERT WAGNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; OFFICER
HICKS; OFFICER LUDWIG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-95-657-3)
Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Hubert Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Leonard Taylor,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virgin-
ia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and
the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. See
United States v. Williams,
674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). Ac-
cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wagner
v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-95-657-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 9,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2