Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fisher v. High, 96-7029 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7029 Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 20, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7029 WILLIAM LEE FISHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID L. HIGH, Special Agent, Drug Enforcement Administration; U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY; OTHER UNKNOWN AGENTS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-94-1110-R) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circ
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7029 WILLIAM LEE FISHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID L. HIGH, Special Agent, Drug Enforcement Administration; U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY; OTHER UNKNOWN AGENTS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-94-1110-R) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Lee Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Corcoran, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action to recover $10,000 which was administratively for- feited as proceeds of drug trafficking. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fisher v. High, No. CA-94-1110-R (W.D. Va. May 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer