Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ford-Bey v. Fry, 96-7030 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7030 Visitors: 43
Filed: Dec. 17, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7030 ANGELO LEWIS FORD-BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR FRY, Medical Physician; MRS. HANCOCK; NURSE HARVALL; MRS. MOON; MRS. HOGGIN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-474-3) Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: December 17, 1996 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7030 ANGELO LEWIS FORD-BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR FRY, Medical Physician; MRS. HANCOCK; NURSE HARVALL; MRS. MOON; MRS. HOGGIN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-474-3) Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: December 17, 1996 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Angelo Lewis Ford-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from a magistrate judge's order entered for payment of fees pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act* and the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. Ford-Bey v. Fry, No. CA-96-474-3 (E.D. Va. June 12 and 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We deny Appellant's motion for summary judgment. AFFIRMED * Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer