Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fleming v. Gaines, 96-7182 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7182 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 06, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7182 DEREK MARQUIS FLEMING, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus D. E. GAINES, Police Officer at Greensboro Police Department; SYLVESTER DAUGHTRY, Chief of Police, Greensboro Police Department, Defendants - Appellees, and GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-225) Submitted: Novemb
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7182 DEREK MARQUIS FLEMING, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus D. E. GAINES, Police Officer at Greensboro Police Department; SYLVESTER DAUGHTRY, Chief of Police, Greensboro Police Department, Defendants - Appellees, and GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-225) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 6, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derek Marquis Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Reeves Davis, Jr., NICHOLS, CAFFREY, HILL, EVANS & MURRELLE, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fleming v. Gaines, No. CA- 94-225 (M.D.N.C. May 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer