Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Morgan v. Commissioner, 96-7366 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7366 Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 20, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7366 ROBERT TYRONE MORGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER, Maryland Division of Correc- tions; WARDEN, Baltimore City Detention Cen- ter; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1405-H) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996 Before RUSS
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7366 ROBERT TYRONE MORGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER, Maryland Division of Correc- tions; WARDEN, Baltimore City Detention Cen- ter; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1405-H) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Tyrone Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Amy Kushner Kline, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Morgan v. Commissioner, No. CA-96-1405-H (D. Md. Aug. 12, 1996). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer