Filed: Nov. 25, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7526 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERROL WINTER, a/k/a Tony Tubbs, a/k/a Smiley, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-93-90) Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 25, 1996 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7526 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERROL WINTER, a/k/a Tony Tubbs, a/k/a Smiley, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-93-90) Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 25, 1996 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished p..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7526 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERROL WINTER, a/k/a Tony Tubbs, a/k/a Smiley, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-93-90) Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 25, 1996 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Errol Winter, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appel- lant's motion to obtain disclosure of a grand jury voting record. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Winter, No. CR-93-90 (E.D. Va. Sept. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
