Filed: Apr. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2566 TERRA O'HARA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SERGEANT WESTFALL, Marshall County, West Virginia, Sheriff Lightner's Sergeant; DEPUTY PHILLIPS, Marshall County, West Virginia, Sheriff Lightner's Deputy, Defendants - Appellees, and MARSHALL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA; SHERIFF LIGHTNER; MARSHALL COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2566 TERRA O'HARA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SERGEANT WESTFALL, Marshall County, West Virginia, Sheriff Lightner's Sergeant; DEPUTY PHILLIPS, Marshall County, West Virginia, Sheriff Lightner's Deputy, Defendants - Appellees, and MARSHALL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA; SHERIFF LIGHTNER; MARSHALL COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at W..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2566 TERRA O'HARA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SERGEANT WESTFALL, Marshall County, West Virginia, Sheriff Lightner's Sergeant; DEPUTY PHILLIPS, Marshall County, West Virginia, Sheriff Lightner's Deputy, Defendants - Appellees, and MARSHALL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA; SHERIFF LIGHTNER; MARSHALL COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-93-180-5-CV) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 24, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terra O'Hara, Appellant Pro Se. George Monroe Schumann, DICKIE, MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, P.C., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; John R. Cox, DICKIE, MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. O'Hara v. Westfall, No. CA-93-180-5-CV (N.D.W. Va. July 21, 1995). We deny Appellant's motions for default judgment, for sanctions against De- fendant's counsel, to remand case, for appointment of counsel, "for A rule that Defendants - Appellees Show Cause," for an injunction, to strike Appellees' pleadings, "for Declaratory Judgment under 28 USC 2201," "to Disqualify Judge Stamp," "to construe Title and Par- ties to Appeal," and to transfer case to district court. We grant Appellant's motion to expedite the appeal to the extent possible given the court's busy docket. We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 2 AFFIRMED 3