Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pouyan v. Smith, 96-1343 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1343 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 29, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1343 KOOSHA E. POUYAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID M. SMITH; MIKE G. SHENIGO; AUTOMATED CONVEYOR SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-28-L) Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1343 KOOSHA E. POUYAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID M. SMITH; MIKE G. SHENIGO; AUTOMATED CONVEYOR SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-28-L) Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Koosha Pouyan, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Cornelius Wood, III, Kristine H. Smith, EDMUNDS & WILLIAMS, P.C., Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Koosha Pouyan appeals the district court's order granting sum- mary judgment to Defendants in this action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e- 2 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pouyan v. Smith, No. CA-95-28-L (W.D. Va. Feb. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer