Filed: Jan. 16, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1530 BARBARA J. NEWSOME-BALTROP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAYCO AMERICAN CORPORATION; FM SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-95-978-A) Submitted: December 10, 1996 Decided: January 16, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1530 BARBARA J. NEWSOME-BALTROP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAYCO AMERICAN CORPORATION; FM SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-95-978-A) Submitted: December 10, 1996 Decided: January 16, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1530 BARBARA J. NEWSOME-BALTROP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAYCO AMERICAN CORPORATION; FM SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-95-978-A) Submitted: December 10, 1996 Decided: January 16, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barbara J. Newsome-Baltrop, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Lang Lowndes, BUTLER, MACON, WILLIAMS, PANTELE & LOWNDES, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Barbara J. Newsome-Baltrop appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this employment dis- crimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Newsome-Baltrop v. Payco American Corp., No. CA-95-978-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2