Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Barton v. Thompson, 96-1669 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1669
Filed: Mar. 18, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1669 MELBA BARTON; MONIQUE BARTON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus KENNETH THOMPSON; CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, t/a Friendship Inn; MANOR CARE, INCORPORATED, t/a Friendship Inn, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-2154-HAR) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997 Before HALL,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1669 MELBA BARTON; MONIQUE BARTON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus KENNETH THOMPSON; CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, t/a Friendship Inn; MANOR CARE, INCORPORATED, t/a Friendship Inn, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-2154-HAR) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick James O'Guinn, Sr., Sherae Monique McNeal, O'GUINN & MCNEAL, Columbia, Maryland; Charles Jerome Ware, Columbia, Mary- land, for Appellants. Kenneth Thompson, Havre de Grace, Maryland; Mark D. Laponsky, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Melba and Monique Barton appeal the district court's orders granting the Appellees' summary judgment in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barton v. Thompson, No. CA-95-2154-HAR (D. Md. May 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer