Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Brown v. Annapolis Life Care, 96-1749 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1749 Visitors: 53
Filed: Jan. 13, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1749 MARY E. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANNAPOLIS LIFE CARE, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Ginger Cove; LIFE CARE SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 95-3056-S) Submitted: December 26, 1996 Decided: January 13, 1997 Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1749 MARY E. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANNAPOLIS LIFE CARE, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Ginger Cove; LIFE CARE SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 95-3056-S) Submitted: December 26, 1996 Decided: January 13, 1997 Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary E. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Thomas Sampson, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Mary E. Brown appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. ยงยง 2000e-2, 2000e-3 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Annapolis Life Care, Inc., No. CA- 95-3056-S (D. Md. May 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer