Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bracey v. Moody, 96-2491 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-2491 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 26, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2491 LINDA JOY BRACEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN MOODY, Manager, Appeals and Fair Hear- ings, Virginia Department of Social Services, Defendant - Appellee, and BOBBY RALPH, Director, Suffolk Social Services Department, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-1133-2) Submitted: June 19, 1997 Deci
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2491 LINDA JOY BRACEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN MOODY, Manager, Appeals and Fair Hear- ings, Virginia Department of Social Services, Defendant - Appellee, and BOBBY RALPH, Director, Suffolk Social Services Department, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-1133-2) Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 26, 1997 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linda Joy Bracey, Appellant Pro Se. Cheryl Anne Wilkerson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bracey v. Moody, No. CA-95-1133-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer