UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2829 WILLIAM S. STUART, Plaintiff - Appellant, and LAURA K. STUART, Plaintiff, versus GEORGE WASHINGTON NATIONAL FOREST, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-7-H) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 25, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William S. Stuart, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's* order denying his motion to amend and dismissing this civil action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stuart v. George Washington Nat'l Forest, No. CA- 96-7-H (W.D. Va. Nov. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED * The parties agreed to have the claims adjudicated by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994). 3