Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McIntyre v. Carter, 96-7139 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-7139 Visitors: 47
Filed: Jan. 06, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7139 CAROLE ANN MCINTYRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES CARTER, Warden; MITCHELL FRANKS, As- sistant Warden; OWEN LANGFORD, Chief of Secu- rity; RICHARD LANHAM, JR., Commissioner of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 95-816-PJM) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997 Before
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7139 CAROLE ANN MCINTYRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES CARTER, Warden; MITCHELL FRANKS, As- sistant Warden; OWEN LANGFORD, Chief of Secu- rity; RICHARD LANHAM, JR., Commissioner of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 95-816-PJM) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carole Ann McIntyre, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McIntyre v. Carter, No. CA-95-816-PJM (D. Md. July 3, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer