Filed: Jan. 23, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7264 KENNETH FRANKLIN HUDDLESTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEON DIXON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-96-699-AM) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenn
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7264 KENNETH FRANKLIN HUDDLESTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEON DIXON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-96-699-AM) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenne..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7264
KENNETH FRANKLIN HUDDLESTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LEON DIXON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-96-699-AM)
Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 1997
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Franklin Huddleston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals from the district court's
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915 (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act,
Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Appellant, at most, alleges a disagreement with the prison
doctors as to the course of medical treatment that he received.
Such allegations are not cognizable under § 1983. See Wright v.
Collins,
766 F.2d 841, 849 (4th Cir. 1985). Accordingly, we affirm.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2