Filed: Jan. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7426 DANIEL DENNIS COLLINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIEUTENANT STEWART; SERGEANT KENT; CARTER, C.O.; DARRY, C.O.; DONNELL, C.O., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96- 1994-L) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 24, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7426 DANIEL DENNIS COLLINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIEUTENANT STEWART; SERGEANT KENT; CARTER, C.O.; DARRY, C.O.; DONNELL, C.O., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96- 1994-L) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 24, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Af..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7426 DANIEL DENNIS COLLINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIEUTENANT STEWART; SERGEANT KENT; CARTER, C.O.; DARRY, C.O.; DONNELL, C.O., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96- 1994-L) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 24, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Dennis Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Daniel Dennis Collins appeals the district court's order deny- ing his motion for reconsideration of its earlier order placing Appellant's civil rights actions on the inactive docket. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Collins v. Stewart, No. CA-96-1994-L (D. Md. Aug. 9, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
