Filed: Feb. 27, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7541 JOHN MCKINNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JESSIE PERLADO; ROBERT O. CARMICHAEL; JUDITH M. HAAS; SIMMS HUNTER RENTZ; PARKER EVATT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-95-3433-2-22-AJ) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUT
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7541 JOHN MCKINNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JESSIE PERLADO; ROBERT O. CARMICHAEL; JUDITH M. HAAS; SIMMS HUNTER RENTZ; PARKER EVATT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-95-3433-2-22-AJ) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7541 JOHN MCKINNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JESSIE PERLADO; ROBERT O. CARMICHAEL; JUDITH M. HAAS; SIMMS HUNTER RENTZ; PARKER EVATT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-95-3433-2-22-AJ) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John McKinney, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McKinney v. Perlado, No. CA-95-3433-2-22-AJ (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
