Filed: Aug. 05, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7569 SYLPHIDE A. SPENCER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. DOLAN, Lieutenant; WENDY HOBBS, Warden, Virginia Correctional Center for Women, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-680) Submitted: July 22, 1997 Decided: August 5, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7569 SYLPHIDE A. SPENCER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. DOLAN, Lieutenant; WENDY HOBBS, Warden, Virginia Correctional Center for Women, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-680) Submitted: July 22, 1997 Decided: August 5, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Af..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7569 SYLPHIDE A. SPENCER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. DOLAN, Lieutenant; WENDY HOBBS, Warden, Virginia Correctional Center for Women, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-680) Submitted: July 22, 1997 Decided: August 5, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sylphide A. Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on her claim under 42 U.S.C.A. ยง 1983 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spencer v. Hobbs, No. CA-96-680 (E.D. Va. Sept. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
