Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jackson v. Maryland State, 97-1539 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-1539 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 22, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1539 IDA M. JACKSON; VENUS O. JACKSON; AARON P. JACKSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus SUSAN WAHLGREN, formerly known as S. R. Hollinger, Trooper, Maryland State Police, Defendant - Appellee, and MARYLAND STATE POLICE; LARRY W. TOLLIVER, Colonel Superintendent Maryland State Police; D. B. MACLEAN, 1st Lieutenant Commander; SERGEANT CASPER; OFFICER GOLDMAN; OFFICER LASSIE; OFFICER HOUSE; OFFICER NORDSTRAM; J. O. HAMMELMANN
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1539 IDA M. JACKSON; VENUS O. JACKSON; AARON P. JACKSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus SUSAN WAHLGREN, formerly known as S. R. Hollinger, Trooper, Maryland State Police, Defendant - Appellee, and MARYLAND STATE POLICE; LARRY W. TOLLIVER, Colonel Superintendent Maryland State Police; D. B. MACLEAN, 1st Lieutenant Commander; SERGEANT CASPER; OFFICER GOLDMAN; OFFICER LASSIE; OFFICER HOUSE; OFFICER NORDSTRAM; J. O. HAMMELMANN, Major, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 93-2504-DKC) Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 22, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ida M. Jackson, Venus O. Jackson, Aaron P. Jackson, Appellants Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Mary- land; Betty Stemley Sconion, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly Elizabeth Rice, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Pikes- ville, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. To the extent Appellants' notice of appeal brings up for considera- tion the district court's rulings in prior orders, we find no error and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jackson v. Mary- land State Police, No. CA-93-2504-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 7, 1997; Apr. 12 and Oct 21, 1996; June 20, 1995; Oct. 8 and Nov. 4, 1993). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer