Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Riley v. VA Commonwealth Univ, 97-1726 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-1726 Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 21, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1726 ISABELLE R. L. RILEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY; VCU/MCV SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1017) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 21, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1726 ISABELLE R. L. RILEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY; VCU/MCV SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1017) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 21, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Isabelle R. L. Riley, Appellant Pro Se. David Lee Ross, Pamela Finley Boston, VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY, Richmond, Vir- ginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's adverse grant of sum- mary judgment, and dismissal of Appellant's case filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. ยง 2000e (West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Riley v. Virginia Commonwealth Univ., No. CA-96-1017 (E.D. Va. May 8, 1997). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer