Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sligh v. Runyon, 97-2022 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-2022 Visitors: 33
Filed: Oct. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2022 FELICIA D. SLIGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARVIN RUNYON, Postmaster General; UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-3028-Y) Submitted: October 10, 1997 Decided: October 24, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curi
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2022 FELICIA D. SLIGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARVIN RUNYON, Postmaster General; UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-3028-Y) Submitted: October 10, 1997 Decided: October 24, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Felicia D. Sligh, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Albert David Copperthite, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defen- dant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's claims of racial discrimination, retaliatory discharge, and lack of union representation. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sligh v. Runyon, No. CA-96-3028-Y (D. Md. June 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer