Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hosch v. Bandag, Incorporated, 97-2308 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-2308 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 24, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2308 CLAUDE HOSCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BANDAG, INCORPORATED; GRANVILLE COUNTY SUPE- RIOR COURT; CHEMICAL RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-1083-5-BR) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 24, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHIL
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2308 CLAUDE HOSCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BANDAG, INCORPORATED; GRANVILLE COUNTY SUPE- RIOR COURT; CHEMICAL RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-1083-5-BR) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 24, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Claude Hosch, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Gray Styers, Jr., KIL- PATRICK STOCKTON, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Claude Hosch appeals the district court's order dismissing Defendants Granville County Superior Court and Chemical Residential Mortgage Company as frivolous, and granting summary judgment to Bandag on Hosch's state law claims for fraud, financial harassment, and clerical misprision. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hosch v. Bandag, No. CA-95-1083-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer