Filed: Sep. 12, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-4065 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALFRED TITUS SHULER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-96-13-7-BR) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrence Lee Taylo
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-4065 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALFRED TITUS SHULER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-96-13-7-BR) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrence Lee Taylor..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-4065
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ALFRED TITUS SHULER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge.
(CR-96-13-7-BR)
Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrence Lee Taylor, RICHARD L. CANNON, III, Greenville, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States
Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Peter W.
Kellen, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Alfred Titus Shuler was convicted of four counts of possession
of crack cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21
U.S.C. ยง 841 (West 1981 & Supp. 1997). He was sentenced as a career
offender to a term of 262 months imprisonment. United States
Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual, 4B1.1 (Nov. 1996). On
appeal, he asserts that the district court clearly erred in denying
his motion for a downward departure from the career offender guide-
line range.
A district court's discretionary decision not to depart is not
subject to appellate review. See United States v. Bayerle,
898 F.2d
28, 31 (4th Cir. 1990). Consequently, we lack jurisdiction to
review the issue raised by Shuler. Id.
We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2