Filed: Jun. 27, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-585 In Re: CHARLES WILLIAM LEVY, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 27, 1997 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles William Levy, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Charles Levy has filed a petit
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-585 In Re: CHARLES WILLIAM LEVY, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 27, 1997 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles William Levy, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Charles Levy has filed a petiti..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-585
In Re: CHARLES WILLIAM LEVY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 27, 1997
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles William Levy, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Charles Levy has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seek-
ing an order from this court directing the Virginia State Board of
Elections to place his name on the ballot for governor in the up-
coming gubernatorial election. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be
used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States
Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only
available when there are no other means by which the relief sought
could be granted, see In re Beard,
811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.
1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re
United Steelworkers,
595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). The party
seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he
has "no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires" and
that his right to such relief is "clear and indisputable." Allied
Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,
449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Levy has not
made such a showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
PETITION DENIED
2