Filed: Sep. 22, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6289 BARBARA JO ARCHIE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WENDY HOBBS, Warden, Virginia Correctional Center for Women, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-0469-R) Submitted: September 9, 1997 Decided: September 22, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublis
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6289 BARBARA JO ARCHIE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WENDY HOBBS, Warden, Virginia Correctional Center for Women, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-0469-R) Submitted: September 9, 1997 Decided: September 22, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublish..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6289 BARBARA JO ARCHIE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WENDY HOBBS, Warden, Virginia Correctional Center for Women, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-0469-R) Submitted: September 9, 1997 Decided: September 22, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Morchower, MORCHOWER, LUXTON & WHALEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. Archie v. Hobbs, No. CA-96-0469-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2