UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6763 MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLIE J. CEPAK, Warden, individually and in his official capacity; PRIS MACK, Associate Warden, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-3511-4-21BE) Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 21, 1997 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Cleveland Batson, Robert E. Peterson, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina; Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint, denying Appellant's motions seeking a blank subpoena and recusal of a magistrate judge, and denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration. We have re- viewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. Cepak, No. CA-94-3511-4-21BE (D.S.C. May 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2