Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Funderburk v. Reno, 97-6808 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-6808 Visitors: 39
Filed: Aug. 25, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6808 LANDON FUNDERBURK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JANET RENO; J. M. VANYUR, Warden; MARK HENRY; ED CROSLEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-234-5-F) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 25, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Aff
More
                            UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 97-6808



LANDON FUNDERBURK,

                                             Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus


JANET RENO; J. M. VANYUR, Warden; MARK HENRY;
ED CROSLEY,

                                            Defendants - Appellees.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
Judge. (CA-97-234-5-F)


Submitted:   August 14, 1997              Decided:   August 25, 1997


Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Landon Morris Funderburk, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Funderburk v. Reno,

No. CA-97-234-5-F (E.D.N.C. May 21, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.




                                                          AFFIRMED




       *
         Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 
403 U.S. 388
 (1971).

                                2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer