Filed: Aug. 25, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6908 WILLIAM L. PATCH; LANDON MORRIS FUNDERBURK, JR.; DAVID PARKER; MICHAEL AARON LITTLE; GARY ELLIOTT HOKE; TIMOTHY JAY BLACKWELL; JEFFREY D. PEACE, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus JANET RENO; J. M. VANYUR, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-96-958-5-BO) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decid
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6908 WILLIAM L. PATCH; LANDON MORRIS FUNDERBURK, JR.; DAVID PARKER; MICHAEL AARON LITTLE; GARY ELLIOTT HOKE; TIMOTHY JAY BLACKWELL; JEFFREY D. PEACE, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus JANET RENO; J. M. VANYUR, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-96-958-5-BO) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decide..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6908
WILLIAM L. PATCH; LANDON MORRIS FUNDERBURK,
JR.; DAVID PARKER; MICHAEL AARON LITTLE; GARY
ELLIOTT HOKE; TIMOTHY JAY BLACKWELL; JEFFREY
D. PEACE,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
JANET RENO; J. M. VANYUR, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
Judge. (CA-96-958-5-BO)
Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 25, 1997
Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William L. Patch, Landon Morris Funderburk, Jr., David Parker,
Michael Aaron Little, Gary Elliott Hoke, Timothy Jay Blackwell,
Jeffrey D. Peace, Appellants Pro Se. Eileen Coffey Moore, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Patch
v. Reno, No. CA-96-958-5-BO (E.D.N.C. May 27, 1997). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2