Filed: Dec. 18, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-718 In Re: BRYANT LEGREE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-93-92) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 18, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryant Legree, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Petitioner filed a mandamus petition alleging delay
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-718 In Re: BRYANT LEGREE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-93-92) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 18, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryant Legree, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Petitioner filed a mandamus petition alleging delay ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-718 In Re: BRYANT LEGREE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-93-92) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 18, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryant Legree, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Petitioner filed a mandamus petition alleging delay in the district court in ruling on his motion for reduction of sentence. The district court has since denied the motion. United States v. Legree, No. CR-93-92 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 1997). Accordingly, although we grant Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. PETITION DENIED 2
