Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Williams v. Benjamin, 97-7191 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7191 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 11, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7191 SYLVESTER EMERSON WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CLARENCE BENJAMIN, Captain, Lieber Correction- al Institution; SHIRLEY J. TOMLIN, Lieutenant, Lieber Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-2874-3-2BC) Submitted: November 18, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997 Befor
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7191 SYLVESTER EMERSON WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CLARENCE BENJAMIN, Captain, Lieber Correction- al Institution; SHIRLEY J. TOMLIN, Lieutenant, Lieber Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-2874-3-2BC) Submitted: November 18, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997 Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sylvester Emerson Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Bunyan Lewis, Amy L. Gaffney, LEWIS, REEVES & STONE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defen- dants' motion to compel settlement and denying Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel, a swift and immediate restraining order, and disposition of all pending motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Benjamin, No. CA-93-2874-3-2BC (D.S.C. July 16, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer