Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bell v. Graham, 97-7332 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7332 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 11, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7332 LEONARD BELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID GRAHAM, Assistant Warden, Brunswick Cor- rectional Center; MARVALENA SIMMONS, Counsel- or, Brunswick Correctional Center; LOUIS B. CIE, Chairman, Central Classification Board; JOHN METZER, Former Parole Chairman; BRUCE MORRIS, Acting Chairman; UNKNOWN PAROLE INTER- VIEWER; VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7332 LEONARD BELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID GRAHAM, Assistant Warden, Brunswick Cor- rectional Center; MARVALENA SIMMONS, Counsel- or, Brunswick Correctional Center; LOUIS B. CIE, Chairman, Central Classification Board; JOHN METZER, Former Parole Chairman; BRUCE MORRIS, Acting Chairman; UNKNOWN PAROLE INTER- VIEWER; VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-154-2) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leonard Bell, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attor- ney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bell v. Graham, No. CA-96-154-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer