UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1027 PIETER M. VAN DER SPUY, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FRED W. RAUSCH, JR., Defendant - Appellant, and DEERFIELD HOLDING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; CECIL P. JONES; DEBORAH L. GARDNER, Defendants. No. 98-1182 PIETER M. VAN DER SPUY, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FRED W. RAUSCH, JR., Defendant - Appellant,  and DEERFIELD HOLDING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; CECIL P. JONES; DEBORAH L. GARDNER, Defendants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1233-2) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 12, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fred W. Rausch, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Gerard Test, Michelle Ann Hughes, CLARK & STANT, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Rausch appeals the district court’s order entering a judgment against him and in favor of the Appellee for federal common law fraud, Virginia common law fraud, federal mail fraud, and breach of contract. We find that the dis- trict court had subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1994). Further, we have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Furthermore, we grant Rausch’s motion to file a supplemental reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3