Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Booth v. Prince George Health, 96-2509 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-2509 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 18, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2509 KEITH E. BOOTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE ON AIDS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 93-3905-PJM) Submitted: February 24, 1998 Decided: March 18, 1998 Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith E
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2509 KEITH E. BOOTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE ON AIDS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 93-3905-PJM) Submitted: February 24, 1998 Decided: March 18, 1998 Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith E. Booth, Appellant Pro Se. John Anthony Bielec, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Booth appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing Booth's action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. ยงยง 2000e to 2000e-16 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), for failure to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Booth v. Prince George's County, No. CA-93-3905-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 19, 1996). We deny Booth's "Motion Request for Reconsideration." We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer