Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Eaton v. NBC, 97-2162 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-2162 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 21, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2162 WENDY C. EATON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; THE WB NETWORK, Defendants - Appellees, and WITT/THOMAS PRODUCTIONS; JIM VALLELY; JONATHAN SCHMOCK; WALT DISNEY COMPANY, INCORPORATED; TIME WARNER, INCORPORATED; BUENA VISTA TELE- VISION; WALT DISNEY PICTURES AND TELEVISION, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexan
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2162 WENDY C. EATON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; THE WB NETWORK, Defendants - Appellees, and WITT/THOMAS PRODUCTIONS; JIM VALLELY; JONATHAN SCHMOCK; WALT DISNEY COMPANY, INCORPORATED; TIME WARNER, INCORPORATED; BUENA VISTA TELE- VISION; WALT DISNEY PICTURES AND TELEVISION, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-97-73-A) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 21, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wendy C. Eaton, Appellant Pro Se. Jay Ward Brown, Michael Dennis Sullivan, LEVINE, PIERSON, SULLIVAN & KOCH, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her copyright infringement action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Eaton v. NBC, No. CA-97-73-A (E.D. Va. Aug. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer