Filed: Jul. 16, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2262 GRETA FAISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOURNAL NEWSPAPERS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-97-155-A) Submitted: April 30, 1998 Decided: July 16, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Greta Faison, Appellant Pro
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2262 GRETA FAISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOURNAL NEWSPAPERS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-97-155-A) Submitted: April 30, 1998 Decided: July 16, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Greta Faison, Appellant Pro ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2262
GRETA FAISON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOURNAL NEWSPAPERS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-97-155-A)
Submitted: April 30, 1998 Decided: July 16, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Greta Faison, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Bredehoft, VENABLE,
BAETJER & HOWARD, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment to Defendant in this employment discrimination action. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no
reversible error. Appellant’s claim of retaliatory discharge was
properly dismissed because Appellant failed to establish a prima
facie case. See Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.,
759 F.2d
355, 365 (4th Cir. 1985). In addition, Appellant’s claim that she
was terminated because of her race was properly dismissed because
she failed demonstrate that Defendant’s legitimate, non-
discriminatory reason for her dismissal was a mere pretext for
discrimination. See Texas Dep’t of Community Affairs v. Burdine,
450 U.S. 248, 253 (1981). Accordingly, we affirm. Faison v. Jour-
nal Newspapers, Inc., No. CA-97-155-A (E.D. Va. Aug. 18, 1997). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2