Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Doe v. Towson State Univ, 97-2453 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-2453 Visitors: 35
Filed: Jun. 18, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2453 JOHN DOE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOWSON STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1262-JFM) Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Doe, Appellan
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2453 JOHN DOE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOWSON STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1262-JFM) Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Doe, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Allen Weitzner, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Michael Anthony Anselmi, Assistant Attorney General, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant in Appellant’s employment discrim- ination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Doe v. Towson State Univ., No. CA-96-1262-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 2, 1997). We deny Appellant’s motion to reseal the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer