Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

White v. Disciplinary Commit, 97-2534 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-2534 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 17, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2534 In Re: ELVIRA M. WHITE _ ELVIRA M. WHITE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THIS COURT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-170) Submitted: August 31, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circui
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2534 In Re: ELVIRA M. WHITE _________________________ ELVIRA M. WHITE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THIS COURT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-170) Submitted: August 31, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elvira M. White, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Joseph Immelt, HOGAN & HARTSON, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Elvira M. White appeals the order of the United States Dis- trict Court for the District of Maryland indefinitely suspending her from practicing law before that court. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the disciplinary committee’s recommendation and find no abuse of discretion. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. White v. Disciplinary Comm., No. CA-97-170 (D. Md. Oct. 1, 1997). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer