Filed: Aug. 24, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2701 In Re: JIM BECK, INCORPORATED, Debtor. _ JOHN WESLEY OWNBY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JIM BECK, INCORPORATED, Debtor - Appellee, and US TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-59-C, BK-96-687-WA3-11) Submitted: July 21, 1998 Decided: August 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, E
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2701 In Re: JIM BECK, INCORPORATED, Debtor. _ JOHN WESLEY OWNBY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JIM BECK, INCORPORATED, Debtor - Appellee, and US TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-59-C, BK-96-687-WA3-11) Submitted: July 21, 1998 Decided: August 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, ER..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2701 In Re: JIM BECK, INCORPORATED, Debtor. _________________________ JOHN WESLEY OWNBY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JIM BECK, INCORPORATED, Debtor - Appellee, and US TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-59-C, BK-96-687-WA3-11) Submitted: July 21, 1998 Decided: August 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Wesley Ownby, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Stephen Scott, SCOTT & KRONER, P.C., Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: John Ownby appeals the district court’s order affirming a decision and order of the bankruptcy court confirming and approving the Plan of Reorganization of Jim Beck, Inc. over Ownby’s objec- tions. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason- ing of the district court. Ownby v. Jim Beck, Inc., Nos. CA-97-59- C; BK-96-687-WA3-11 (W.D. Va. Nov. 21, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2