Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. McClain, 97-4510 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-4510 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 08, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-4510 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY MCCLAIN, a/k/a Ice, a/k/a New York, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-96-179) Submitted: August 18, 1998 Decided: September 8, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam o
More
                               UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                               No. 97-4510



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff - Appellee,

          versus


ANTHONY MCCLAIN, a/k/a Ice, a/k/a New York,

                                               Defendant - Appellant.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.   Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-96-179)


Submitted:   August 18, 1998              Decided:   September 8, 1998


Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.


Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


William Elvin Hopkins, Jr., MCCUTCHEN, BLANTON, RHODES & JOHNSON,
L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey,
United States Attorney, Scarlett A. Wilson, Assistant United States
Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

       Anthony McClain was convicted pursuant to his guilty pleas of

carjacking, armed robbery, carrying a firearm in connection with a

crime of violence, and possession of a firearm by a convicted

felon. On appeal, he alleges that he should have been tried in

state,      rather          than   federal,   court,     that    the    district     court

improperly applied the Sentencing Guidelines* in calculating his

sentence, and that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance.

Because we find that McClain failed to file a timely notice of

appeal, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

       The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by

Fed.       R.        App.    P.    4.   These       periods     are     “mandatory    and

jurisdictional.” United States v. Raynor, 
939 F.2d 191
, 197 (4th

Cir. 1991). Criminal defendants must file their notices of appeal

within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b).

Although this time period may be extended in certain circumstances,

none of these apply to McClain.

       The district court filed its judgment and commitment order on

November 19, 1996. McClain filed his notice of appeal on June 24,

1997, which is well beyond the ten-day appeal period. McClain’s

failure         to    note    a    timely   appeal    leaves     this    court   without

jurisdiction to consider the merits of his appeal. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the


       *
           U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (1995).

                                                2
facts   and   legal    contentions   are   adequately   presented     in   the

materials     before   the   court   and   argument   would   not    aid   the

decisional process.




                                                                    DISMISSED




                                      3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer