Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Wellons, 97-6348 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-6348 Visitors: 38
Filed: Jul. 16, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6348 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHERMAN L. WELLONS, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-251, CA-96-907-5) Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: July 16, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished p
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6348 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHERMAN L. WELLONS, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-251, CA-96-907-5) Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: July 16, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherman L. Wellons, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OF- FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wellons, Nos. CR-91-251; CA-96-907-5 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer