Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Bramwell, 97-6967 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-6967 Visitors: 34
Filed: Oct. 21, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6967 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARLON BRAMWELL, Defendant - Appellant. No. 98-6226 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARLON BRAMWELL, a/k/a May Day, Defendant - Appellant. No. 98-6227 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARLON BRAMWELL, a/k/a May Day, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virgi
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6967 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARLON BRAMWELL, Defendant - Appellant. No. 98-6226 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARLON BRAMWELL, a/k/a May Day, Defendant - Appellant. No. 98-6227 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARLON BRAMWELL, a/k/a May Day, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge; Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-429-A, CA-97-677-AM) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 21, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Nos. 97-6967 and 98-6227 affirmed and No. 98-6226 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marlon Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Clifford Chesnut, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Marlon Bramwell seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion to modify a discovery order in No. 97-6967; de- nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), in No. 98-6226; and denying his motion for a certificate of appealability in No. 98-6227. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. According- ly, we affirm in appeals No. 97-6967 and No. 98-6227, and deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal in No. 98-6226 on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bramwell, Nos. CR-91-429; CA-97-677-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 1996, July 21 & Sept. 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Nos. 97-6967 and 98-6227 - AFFIRMED No. 98-6226 - DISMISSED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer