Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Green v. Dept Public Safety, 97-7350 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7350 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 28, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7350 VICTOR COLLYN GREENE, Plaintiff - Appellant versus DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; EARL BESHEARS, Warden, in his official capacity as Warden of Eastern Correctional Institution; MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL PRE-RELEASE SYSTEM; WARDEN CORCORAN, in his official capacity as Warden of Maryland Correctional Pre-Release System; RICHARD LANHAM, Commis- sioner, in his official
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7350 VICTOR COLLYN GREENE, Plaintiff - Appellant versus DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; EARL BESHEARS, Warden, in his official capacity as Warden of Eastern Correctional Institution; MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL PRE-RELEASE SYSTEM; WARDEN CORCORAN, in his official capacity as Warden of Maryland Correctional Pre-Release System; RICHARD LANHAM, Commis- sioner, in his official capacity as Commis- sioner of Correction, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-1901-JFM) Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Collyn Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court's orders dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 1915(e) (West Supp. 1997), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Greene v. Department of Public Safety, No. CA-97-1901-JFM (D. Md. July 21 & Aug. 22, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer