Filed: Jan. 30, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7466 KYLE ANTON DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JEFFREY W. FRAZIER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-97-628) Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 30, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kyle Anto
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7466 KYLE ANTON DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JEFFREY W. FRAZIER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-97-628) Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 30, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kyle Anton..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7466
KYLE ANTON DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JEFFREY W. FRAZIER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-97-628)
Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 30, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kyle Anton Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his
mandamus petition which sought an order compelling the superinten-
dent of Northern Neck Regional Jail, Jeffrey Frazier, to provide
prisoners with additional legal resources and to provide access to
those resources in preparation for trial. While the appeal was
pending, Appellant was transferred to another facility. According-
ly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See Magee v. Waters,
810 F.2d
451, 452 (4th Cir. 1987). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2