Filed: Jun. 09, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7538 JAMES L. BOULER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus I. STEVEN COUNTS, Disciplinary Hearing Offi- cer; M. E. RAY, Warden; MARGARET C. HAMBRICK, Regional Director; N. G. TRUDEL, National In- mate Appeals; EPHRAIM W. GREEN, Correctional Officer; STEVEN LARBER, Unit Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (C
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7538 JAMES L. BOULER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus I. STEVEN COUNTS, Disciplinary Hearing Offi- cer; M. E. RAY, Warden; MARGARET C. HAMBRICK, Regional Director; N. G. TRUDEL, National In- mate Appeals; EPHRAIM W. GREEN, Correctional Officer; STEVEN LARBER, Unit Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7538 JAMES L. BOULER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus I. STEVEN COUNTS, Disciplinary Hearing Offi- cer; M. E. RAY, Warden; MARGARET C. HAMBRICK, Regional Director; N. G. TRUDEL, National In- mate Appeals; EPHRAIM W. GREEN, Correctional Officer; STEVEN LARBER, Unit Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-96-3673-6-18AK) Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 9, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James L. Bouler, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James L. Bouler appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action challenging his prison disciplinary conviction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bouler v. Counts, No. CA-96-3673-6-18AK (D.S.C. Sept. 2, 1997). We deny Bouler's motion to supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2